Book Review: King Rat

Something is astir in the shadows of London’s underbelly. Something ancient and strong. Something with a trail of blood in its wake.

When Saul Garamond returns home late one night, he crawls straight into bed to avoid a confrontation with his estranged father. Hours later he awakens to a swarm of angry blue-suited policemen. The reason? His father has been found dead. And Saul is the primary suspect.

Confined to a cell for further questioning, he’s visited by a bizarre and unsettling stranger – the big-time crime boss. The scavenger chief. The intruder.  The whiskered boy. The Duce of the sewers. The king.

King Rat.

Freed from his cell, Saul embarks on a journey through subterranean passages and rooftops that kiss the cold night sky. His heritage is a dark and powerful one… and he finds himself marked for slaughter in an age-old war of mythic proportions.

Set in 1990s London, King Rat is China Mieville’s debut novel, and a striking one at that. Skillfully plotted and populated with bizarre characters, it’s a dark and twisty Urban Fantasy that cuts from brooding intrigue to violent action as it builds cleverly upon the famous story of the Pied Piper of Hamlin.

Much praise has been showered on Mieville’s exceptional word-craft, and with one of his books under my belt, I can say with confidence that the praise is well deserved: this guy can write. His prose is vibrant and creative, brimming with allusive imagery that catches the eye and with it, the imagination.

Back in that cell, the grotesque figure calling itself King Rat had impaled Saul with his grandiloquent and preposterous declamations, taking his breath away and rendering him dumb. then he had paused again, and hunched those bony shoulders defensively. And again that invitation, as casual as from a bored lover at a party. “Shall we go?” (p. 36)

If you’re already adding King Rat to your list of potential reads… wait just a minute. I’m not done.

Seeing as how the story largely revolves around rats (and their king), it should come as no surprise that multiple scenes take place in the London sewers. Vile, right? But here’s the thing: those sewers are positively pristine compared to the book’s dialogue.

Unsavory characters in an unsavory setting will naturally speak with unsavory language – so the argument goes, and to a certain extent, I understand the reasoning behind it. Mieville, however, goes over-the-top and higher still. The sheer amount of swearing in King Rat is simply astounding, and I’m not talking about mild stuff, either – this is the type of pervasive gutter language one would expect from a Quentin Tarantino film. Resovoir Dogs is probably a fitting comparison.

“Well,” you say, “that’s how those kinds of people talk. It’s a fact of life.” Maybe so. But Mieville could’ve cut the amount of profanity by half, and still convinced his readers – beyond a shadow of a doubt – that his characters weren’t nice ‘uns.

If you’re still curious about reading this book… don’t be. The interesting story and fine writing do not redeem it.  The overall reading experience can be summed up as follows: it’s like being lambasted with a cricket bat and then coated in raw sewage.


20 thoughts on “Book Review: King Rat”

  1. Reading the title, I thought you were reviewing a James Clavell book and one of my favorites. Bummer about the language in this one since the writing’s so good, though. I guess some authors don’t realize how much it can detract from the story.

    1. I’d heard that there was another book with the same title. Interesting. Clavell’s Shogun is on my TBR for this year.

      Agreed about the language: had Mieville exercised some restraint, it would’ve been one heckuva read. (Thankfully, it seems the “profanity overload” isn’t present in most of his other works. Or so I’m told).

      1. I also thought you meant Clavell’s book. The Shogun series is great — I really think you’ll enjoy it. If I remember right, King Rat is the 4th or 5th in that series, but it’s been a long time since I’ve read them (and I’m too lazy to look it up). Great books though; I highly recommend them.

  2. Interesting story. Too bad about the language, though. :( Thank you for posting such an honest review.

  3. I liked your review, and the fact that you took the time to write with quality and style, even for a book that you would not recommend. I confess I was excited at first assuming you were talking about the James Clavell book, which I still haven’t read although I’ve been curious about it.

    1. Thanks, Ben. :) That’s two people now who assumed I was referring to Clavell’s book – I’ll have to read it sometime and then really post a review of it. Sorry for the bait-and-switch. ;)

  4. Yuck. My children think I’m rather quaint, but I was taught that speakers or writers who rely on such an over-abundance of foul language are not really good writers (or speakers). anyway, it’s not my cuppa.

  5. So… I told you on twitter that I would tell you about “Perfect Storm.”

    I will not go in – depth, but it was very action packed. The beginning had some (more like muchly) *bar scenes* and unwholesome romance, the middle had pretty bad foul language and the end wasn’t as exciting as I had anticipated.

    Overall jest, would I watch it again? Skip the first and last parts, and mute all the language, yes I would, for all the action. The effects were wonderful, and it had a *classic* ending.

    Would I recommend it? Probably not, there’s better ones out there.

    – M

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s